Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCIX
FSPHX vs LHCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCIX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. LHCIX (7.64M). LHCIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCIX (0.56) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCIX (6 years). LHCIX (3.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCIX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCIX (1000000). LHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.92 vs. FSPHX (-15.25). LHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.59 vs. FSPHX (-13.73).
| FSPHX | LHCIX | FSPHX / LHCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.09 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | 1.757 | -125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 7.64M | 77,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.56 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.25 | -2.92 | 523% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.92 | 25.21 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.73 | 3.59 | -383% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement