Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCIX
FSPHX vs LHCIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCIX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. LHCIX (6.9M). LHCIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCIX (0.60) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCIX (6 years). LHCIX (3.28) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). LHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCIX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCIX (1000000). LHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.51 vs. FSPHX (-16.06). LHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 12.89 vs. FSPHX (-2.55).
| FSPHX | LHCIX | FSPHX / LHCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.78 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 3.28 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.817 | -12.662 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 6.9M | 92,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.60 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.06 | -11.51 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.21 | -10.90 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.55 | 12.89 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...