Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCIX
FSPHX vs LHCIX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCIX
FSPHX vs LHCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCIX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. LHCIX (8.03M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCIX: FSPHX (0.45) vs LHCIX (0.37). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCIX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCIX (7 years). LHCIX (3.23) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCIX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCIX (1000000). LHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.72 vs. FSPHX (-1.60). LHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 8.36 vs. FSPHX (-24.04).
| FSPHX | LHCIX | FSPHX / LHCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.78 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 3.23 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.879 | -3.650 | 325% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 8.03M | 71,978% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.37 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.60 | 18.72 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.75 | 17.96 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.04 | 8.36 | -288% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers