Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCOX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. LHCOX (6.9M). LHCOX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCOX (0.59) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCOX (6 years). LHCOX (3.10) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.38 vs. FSPHX (-16.06). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 13.29 vs. FSPHX (-2.55).
| FSPHX | LHCOX | FSPHX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.60 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 3.10 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.817 | -12.667 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 6.9M | 92,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.06 | -11.38 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.21 | -10.64 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.55 | 13.29 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...