Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCOX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. LHCOX (7.23M). LHCOX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCOX (0.58) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCOX (6 years). LHCOX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.71 vs. FSPHX (-15.76). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 0.92 vs. FSPHX (-18.57).
| FSPHX | LHCOX | FSPHX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.165 | -4.943 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 7.23M | 81,900% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.58 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.76 | -8.71 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.99 | 11.13 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.57 | 0.92 | -2,025% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers