Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCOX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. LHCOX (8.62M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCOX: FSPHX (0.39) vs LHCOX (0.34). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCOX (7 years). LHCOX (3.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.41 vs. FSPHX (6.59). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 10.95 vs. FSPHX (-15.28).
| FSPHX | LHCOX | FSPHX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.68 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 3.13 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.735 | 4.770 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 8.62M | 78,324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.34 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 19.41 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.15 | 37.48 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.28 | 10.95 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers