Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCOX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. LHCOX (8M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCOX: FSPHX (0.45) vs LHCOX (0.38). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCOX (7 years). LHCOX (3.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.12 vs. FSPHX (-2.88). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 13.50 vs. FSPHX (-23.32).
| FSPHX | LHCOX | FSPHX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.13 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.447 | -4.245 | 340% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 8M | 72,320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.38 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.88 | 20.12 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.19 | 20.11 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.32 | 13.50 | -173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement