Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCOX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCOX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. LHCOX (8.74M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCOX: FSPHX (0.41) vs LHCOX (0.35). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCOX (7 years). LHCOX (3.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.07 vs. FSPHX (10.22). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 17.43 vs. FSPHX (-14.87).
| FSPHX | LHCOX | FSPHX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.68 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 3.13 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.326 | 5.383 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 8.74M | 72,894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.35 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 30.07 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.21 | 32.26 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.87 | 17.43 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers