Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCSX
FSPHX vs LHCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCSX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. LHCSX (7.37M). LHCSX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCSX (0.35) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCSX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCSX (6 years). LHCSX (3.34) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.48 vs. FSPHX (-11.63). LHCSX return over 5 years is better than : 9.78 vs. FSPHX (-10.17).
| FSPHX | LHCSX | FSPHX / LHCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.34 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.165 | -4.386 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 7.37M | 79,520% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.35 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.63 | -5.48 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.95 | 20.83 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.17 | 9.78 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement