Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCSX
FSPHX vs LHCSX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCSX
FSPHX vs LHCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCSX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. LHCSX (8.69M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCSX: FSPHX (0.39) vs LHCSX (0.15). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCSX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCSX (7 years). LHCSX (3.48) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.41 vs. FSPHX (11.06). LHCSX return over 5 years is better than : 9.69 vs. FSPHX (-14.64).
| FSPHX | LHCSX | FSPHX / LHCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.03 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 3.48 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.036 | 5.111 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 8.69M | 77,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.15 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.06 | 22.41 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.02 | 39.35 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.64 | 9.69 | -151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement