Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCSX
FSPHX vs LHCSX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCSX
FSPHX vs LHCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. LHCSX (8M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCSX: FSPHX (0.45) vs LHCSX (0.16). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCSX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCSX (7 years). LHCSX (3.48) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.68 vs. FSPHX (-2.88). LHCSX return over 5 years is better than : 11.67 vs. FSPHX (-23.32).
| FSPHX | LHCSX | FSPHX / LHCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.48 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.447 | -4.356 | 332% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 8M | 72,320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.16 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.88 | 19.68 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.19 | 18.72 | -76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.32 | 11.67 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement