Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCTX
FSPHX vs LHCTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCTX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. LHCTX (6.93M). LHCTX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCTX (0.60) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCTX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCTX (6 years). LHCTX (3.28) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). LHCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.25 vs. FSPHX (-13.51). LHCTX return over 5 years is better than : 13.97 vs. FSPHX (-0.27).
| FSPHX | LHCTX | FSPHX / LHCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.78 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 3.28 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.651 | -11.789 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 6.93M | 92,528% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.60 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.51 | -10.25 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.53 | -7.09 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.27 | 13.97 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers