Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCTX
FSPHX vs LHCTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCTX commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. LHCTX (7.16M). LHCTX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCTX (0.61) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCTX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCTX (6 years). LHCTX (3.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.16 vs. FSPHX (-10.98). LHCTX return over 5 years is better than : 3.89 vs. FSPHX (-15.24).
| FSPHX | LHCTX | FSPHX / LHCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.09 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.183 | -7.084 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 7.16M | 81,908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.61 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.98 | -5.16 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.06 | 8.05 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.24 | 3.89 | -392% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement