Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCTX
FSPHX vs LHCTX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCTX
FSPHX vs LHCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCTX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. LHCTX (8.62M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCTX: FSPHX (0.39) vs LHCTX (0.35). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCTX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCTX (7 years). LHCTX (3.23) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.41 vs. FSPHX (6.37). LHCTX return over 5 years is better than : 10.50 vs. FSPHX (-15.45).
| FSPHX | LHCTX | FSPHX / LHCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.78 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 3.23 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | 4.793 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 8.62M | 78,270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.35 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 19.41 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 37.09 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | 10.50 | -147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement