Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCVX
FSPHX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCVX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and LHCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. LHCVX (8.73M). FSPHX (0.00) and LHCVX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FSPHX (43 years) vs LHCVX (5 years). LHCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.41 vs. FSPHX (7.35). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 27.22 vs. FSPHX (5.20).
| FSPHX | LHCVX | FSPHX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.651 | 12.622 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.51B | 8.73M | 86,007% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.35 | 17.41 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.79 | 5.63 | -85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.20 | 27.22 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...