Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCVX
FSPHX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCVX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. LHCVX (7.6M). LHCVX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCVX (0.55) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCVX (6 years). LHCVX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.65 vs. FSPHX (-16.94). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 2.67 vs. FSPHX (-15.10).
| FSPHX | LHCVX | FSPHX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.385 | 1.287 | -185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 7.6M | 77,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.55 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.94 | -5.65 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.44 | 15.84 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.10 | 2.67 | -565% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers