Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCVX
FSPHX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCVX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. LHCVX (7.48M). LHCVX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCVX (0.59) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCVX (6 years). LHCVX (3.10) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). LHCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.24 vs. FSPHX (-9.61). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. FSPHX (10.17).
| FSPHX | LHCVX | FSPHX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.60 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 3.10 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.064 | -5.044 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 7.48M | 85,751% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.61 | -3.24 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.12 | -0.81 | 1,249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | 32.77 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...