Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCVX
FSPHX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCVX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. LHCVX (7.31M). LHCVX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCVX (0.61) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCVX (6 years). LHCVX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.62 vs. FSPHX (-12.57). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 7.23 vs. FSPHX (-14.14).
| FSPHX | LHCVX | FSPHX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.486 | -5.198 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 7.31M | 80,260% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.61 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.57 | -5.62 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.18 | 11.35 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.14 | 7.23 | -196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement