Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCVX
FSPHX vs LHCVX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCVX
FSPHX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCVX commentary
Sep 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. LHCVX (8.89M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCVX: FSPHX (0.39) vs LHCVX (0.34). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCVX (7 years). LHCVX (3.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.62 vs. FSPHX (10.53). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 11.20 vs. FSPHX (-15.23).
| FSPHX | LHCVX | FSPHX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.68 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 3.13 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.408 | 8.093 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 8.89M | 75,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.34 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.53 | 23.62 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.60 | 41.09 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.23 | 11.20 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement