Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCVX
FSPHX vs LHCVX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LHCVX
FSPHX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. LHCVX (8.06M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCVX: FSPHX (0.45) vs LHCVX (0.38). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCVX (7 years). LHCVX (3.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). LHCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.59 vs. FSPHX (0.76). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 8.66 vs. FSPHX (-23.99).
| FSPHX | LHCVX | FSPHX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.68 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 3.13 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.527 | -3.281 | 351% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 8.06M | 71,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.38 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | 21.59 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.88 | 21.77 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.99 | 8.66 | -277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement