Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LOGSX
FSPHX vs LOGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LOGSX
FSPHX vs LOGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LOGSX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LOGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. LOGSX (55.4M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LOGSX: FSPHX (0.41) vs LOGSX (0.09). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LOGSX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LOGSX (25 years). LOGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. LOGSX (24.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LOGSX: FSPHX (0) vs LOGSX (2000). LOGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.97 vs. FSPHX (8.99). LOGSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.03 vs. FSPHX (-17.47).
| FSPHX | LOGSX | FSPHX / LOGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.04 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.04 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.854 | 7.349 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 55.4M | 11,495% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.09 | 453% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.99 | 20.97 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.11 | 20.40 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.47 | 17.03 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.49 | 31.71 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement