Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LOGSX
FSPHX vs LOGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs LOGSX
FSPHX vs LOGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LOGSX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LOGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. LOGSX (50.9M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LOGSX: FSPHX (0.45) vs LOGSX (0.10). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LOGSX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LOGSX (25 years). LOGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. LOGSX (24.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LOGSX: FSPHX (0) vs LOGSX (2000). LOGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. FSPHX (-1.76). LOGSX return over 5 years is better than : 14.38 vs. FSPHX (-24.17).
| FSPHX | LOGSX | FSPHX / LOGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.04 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.04 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.020 | 2.761 | -435% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 50.9M | 11,360% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.10 | 469% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.76 | 16.58 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.88 | 18.50 | -70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.17 | 14.38 | -168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.67 | 33.22 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement