Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and PHLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.78B vs. PHLAX (1.59B). FSPHX (0.00) and PHLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PHLAX (26 years). PHLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLAX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLAX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.06 vs. PHLAX (-7.72). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -4.82 vs. PHLAX (-24.07).
| FSPHX | PHLAX | FSPHX / PHLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.835 | -0.471 | -389% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.78B | 1.59B | 427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.06 | -7.72 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.51 | 1.59 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.82 | -24.07 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.91 | -31.41 | -79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...