Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLAX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and PHLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. PHLAX (1.33B). PHLAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: PHLAX (0.81) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PHLAX (26 years). PHLAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). PHLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLAX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLAX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.89 vs. PHLAX (-21.09). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -17.47 vs. PHLAX (-33.25).
| FSPHX | PHLAX | FSPHX / PHLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.13 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.13 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.826 | -3.004 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 1.33B | 444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.81 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.89 | -21.09 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.00 | 0.93 | -538% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.47 | -33.25 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.54 | -43.69 | -15% |