Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLAX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PHLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. PHLAX (1.36B). PHLAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: PHLAX (0.80) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PHLAX (26 years). PHLAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). PHLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLAX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLAX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.06 vs. PHLAX (-24.21). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -2.55 vs. PHLAX (-24.74).
| FSPHX | PHLAX | FSPHX / PHLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.13 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.13 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.817 | -11.926 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 1.36B | 473% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.80 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.06 | -24.21 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.21 | -18.23 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.55 | -24.74 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.12 | -45.45 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...