Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PHLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. PHLAX (1.5B). PHLAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: PHLAX (0.70) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PHLAX (26 years). PHLAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). PHLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLAX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLAX (1000). PHLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.62 vs. FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -8.84 vs. PHLAX (-28.45).
| FSPHX | PHLAX | FSPHX / PHLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.13 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.13 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.532 | 16.843 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 1.5B | 415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.70 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 1.62 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.47 | 21.21 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.84 | -28.45 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.34 | -18.79 | -209% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement