Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and PHLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.05B vs. PHLAX (1.63B). FSPHX (0.00) and PHLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PHLAX (26 years). PHLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLAX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLAX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.11 vs. PHLAX (-11.92). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -3.27 vs. PHLAX (-22.71).
| FSPHX | PHLAX | FSPHX / PHLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.697 | 3.769 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.05B | 1.63B | 432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.11 | -11.92 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.60 | 7.98 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.27 | -22.71 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.95 | -31.99 | -69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...