Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLAX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PHLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. PHLAX (1.51B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PHLAX: FSPHX (0.39) vs PHLAX (0.10). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs PHLAX (27 years). PHLAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). PHLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLAX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLAX (1000). PHLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.01 vs. FSPHX (9.08). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.70 vs. PHLAX (-28.90).
| FSPHX | PHLAX | FSPHX / PHLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.408 | 12.158 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 1.51B | 447% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.10 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.08 | 17.01 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.03 | 12.68 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.70 | -28.90 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.23 | 6.89 | 744% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement