Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PHLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. PHLAX (1.49B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PHLAX: FSPHX (0.41) vs PHLAX (0.10). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs PHLAX (27 years). PHLAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). PHLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLAX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLAX (1000). PHLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.17 vs. FSPHX (8.99). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -17.47 vs. PHLAX (-29.39).
| FSPHX | PHLAX | FSPHX / PHLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.854 | 8.688 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 1.49B | 428% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.10 | 396% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.99 | 17.17 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.11 | 8.92 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.47 | -29.39 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.49 | 1.50 | 2,572% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement