Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLCX
FSPHX vs PHLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and PHLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. PHLCX (1.42B). PHLCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: PHLCX (1.36) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PHLCX (26 years). PHLCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). PHLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLCX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.53 vs. PHLCX (-27.30). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -14.37 vs. PHLCX (-65.63).
| FSPHX | PHLCX | FSPHX / PHLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.303 | 6.795 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 1.42B | 419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.53 | -27.30 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.01 | -13.24 | -53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.37 | -65.63 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.08 | -65.74 | -55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers