Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLCX
FSPHX vs PHLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs PHLCX
FSPHX vs PHLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PHLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. PHLCX (1.49B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PHLCX: FSPHX (0.41) vs PHLCX (0.16). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs PHLCX (27 years). PHLCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). PHLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLCX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. PHLCX (-13.43). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -18.89 vs. PHLCX (-69.87).
| FSPHX | PHLCX | FSPHX / PHLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.97 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.97 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.542 | 6.858 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 1.49B | 428% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.16 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | -13.43 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.52 | -38.86 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.89 | -69.87 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.60 | -65.10 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement