Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RAGHX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and RAGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. RAGHX (101M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RAGHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RAGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RAGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RAGHX (24 years). RAGHX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RAGHX (6.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RAGHX (2500). FSPHX (-13.57) and RAGHX (-13.62) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.17 vs. RAGHX (-26.51).
| FSPHX | RAGHX | FSPHX / RAGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.119 | -5.132 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 101M | 5,678% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.57 | -13.62 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.12 | -16.51 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.17 | -26.51 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.69 | -32.90 | -32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers