Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RAGHX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RAGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. RAGHX (98.1M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RAGHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RAGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RAGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RAGHX (24 years). RAGHX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RAGHX (8.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RAGHX (2500). FSPHX (-9.25) and RAGHX (-9.38) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.08 vs. RAGHX (-25.70).
| FSPHX | RAGHX | FSPHX / RAGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.358 | -1.843 | -291% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 98.1M | 6,080% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.25 | -9.38 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.28 | -3.99 | -207% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.08 | -25.70 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.84 | -22.61 | -172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement