Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RAGHX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RAGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. RAGHX (104M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RAGHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RAGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RAGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RAGHX (23 years). RAGHX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RAGHX (6.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RAGHX (2500). RAGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.19 vs. FSPHX (-13.83). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -16.43 vs. RAGHX (-24.14).
| FSPHX | RAGHX | FSPHX / RAGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.651 | -3.397 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 104M | 5,695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.83 | -12.19 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.48 | -12.96 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.43 | -24.14 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.58 | -32.94 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement