Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RAGHX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RAGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. RAGHX (106M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RAGHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RAGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RAGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RAGHX (23 years). RAGHX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RAGHX (6.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RAGHX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.16 vs. RAGHX (-14.36). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.28 vs. RAGHX (-19.40).
| FSPHX | RAGHX | FSPHX / RAGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.275 | -4.084 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 106M | 5,531% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.16 | -14.36 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.88 | -6.05 | -147% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.28 | -19.40 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.51 | -29.92 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement