Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RAGHX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RAGHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. RAGHX (87M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RAGHX: FSPHX (0.45) vs RAGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RAGHX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RAGHX (24 years). RAGHX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RAGHX (8.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RAGHX (2500). RAGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.51 vs. FSPHX (0.60). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -23.23 vs. RAGHX (-27.46).
| FSPHX | RAGHX | FSPHX / RAGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.40 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.40 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.527 | -8.628 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 87M | 6,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.60 | 4.51 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.66 | -1.88 | 620% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.23 | -27.46 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.73 | -1.11 | -3,047% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement