Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RAGHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RAGHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. RAGHX (89.9M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RAGHX: FSPHX (0.39) vs RAGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RAGHX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RAGHX (25 years). RAGHX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RAGHX (8.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RAGHX (2500). RAGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.17 vs. FSPHX (6.37). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.45 vs. RAGHX (-28.04).
| FSPHX | RAGHX | FSPHX / RAGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.40 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.40 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | -2.090 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 89.9M | 7,508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 9.17 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 6.53 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | -28.04 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | 3.85 | 1,197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement