Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RAGHX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RAGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. RAGHX (93.7M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RAGHX: FSPHX (0.41) vs RAGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RAGHX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RAGHX (24 years). RAGHX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RAGHX (8.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RAGHX (2500). FSPHX (10.84) and RAGHX (10.34) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.12 vs. RAGHX (-23.93).
| FSPHX | RAGHX | FSPHX / RAGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.40 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.40 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.433 | -0.775 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 93.7M | 6,796% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.84 | 10.34 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.94 | 6.47 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.12 | -23.93 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.47 | 2.89 | 1,537% |