Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. RYCFX (85.8M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYCFX (24 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.61 vs. RYCFX (-19.97). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : 10.17 vs. RYCFX (-27.70).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.40 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.43 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.064 | -2.192 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 85.8M | 7,477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.61 | -19.97 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.12 | -24.86 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | -27.70 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.87 | -50.29 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...