Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. RYCFX (86.5M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYCFX (24 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.83 vs. RYCFX (-23.65). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -16.43 vs. RYCFX (-41.77).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.40 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.651 | 3.891 | -145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 86.5M | 6,847% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.83 | -23.65 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.48 | -12.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.43 | -41.77 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.58 | -53.20 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement