Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. RYCFX (105M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYCFX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). RYCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.00 vs. FSPHX (0.35). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -8.45 vs. RYCFX (-29.96).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.569 | 26.742 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 105M | 5,920% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | 3.00 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.51 | 3.67 | 287% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.45 | -29.96 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.39 | -31.40 | -125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement