Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. RYCFX (89.1M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYCFX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). FSPHX (-15.25) and RYCFX (-15.50) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.73 vs. RYCFX (-36.62).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | 10.589 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 89.1M | 6,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.25 | -15.50 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.92 | 2.93 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.73 | -36.62 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.69 | -33.80 | -106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement