Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and RYCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. RYCFX (88.7M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYCFX (24 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.57 vs. RYCFX (-19.34). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.17 vs. RYCFX (-37.97).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.40 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.119 | 7.806 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 88.7M | 6,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.57 | -19.34 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.12 | -13.51 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.17 | -37.97 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.69 | -48.60 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers