Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. RYCFX (143M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.41) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RYCFX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). RYCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.44 vs. FSPHX (10.60). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -16.32 vs. RYCFX (-32.36).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.833 | 22.529 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 143M | 4,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.60 | 29.44 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.42 | 13.18 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.32 | -32.36 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.96 | -11.84 | -397% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement