Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. RYCFX (129M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.42) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RYCFX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). RYCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.50 vs. FSPHX (11.11). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.54 vs. RYCFX (-30.69).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.157 | 22.668 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 129M | 4,883% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 22.50 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.02 | 14.61 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.54 | -30.69 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.70 | -19.82 | -215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement