Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. RYCFX (110M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.45) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RYCFX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). RYCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. FSPHX (-1.10). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -23.61 vs. RYCFX (-37.70).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.879 | 7.262 | -164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 110M | 5,256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.10 | 14.52 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.61 | -4.31 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.61 | -37.70 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.45 | -20.39 | -169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement