Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHCX
FSPHX vs RYHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. RYHCX (22.8M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHCX (25 years). RYHCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHCX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHCX (2500). RYHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. FSPHX (0.02). RYHCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.59 vs. FSPHX (-8.84).
| FSPHX | RYHCX | FSPHX / RYHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.532 | 11.826 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 22.8M | 27,263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 9.60 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.47 | 15.21 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.84 | 5.59 | -158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.34 | 20.37 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement