Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHCX
FSPHX vs RYHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. RYHCX (18.4M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHCX (24 years). RYHCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHCX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHCX (2500). RYHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.47 vs. FSPHX (-13.83). RYHCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.44 vs. FSPHX (-16.43).
| FSPHX | RYHCX | FSPHX / RYHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.40 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.651 | 0.326 | -1,732% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 18.4M | 32,190% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.83 | -6.47 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.48 | 3.32 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.43 | -0.44 | 3,739% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.58 | -11.71 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement