Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHCX
FSPHX vs RYHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHCX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. RYHCX (23.6M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHCX (25 years). RYHCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHCX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHCX (2500). RYHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.14 vs. FSPHX (-12.08). RYHCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.14 vs. FSPHX (-10.94).
| FSPHX | RYHCX | FSPHX / RYHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.872 | 6.513 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 23.6M | 25,271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.08 | -2.14 | 564% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.61 | 18.76 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.94 | 6.14 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.50 | 9.07 | 370% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers