Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHCX
FSPHX vs RYHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs RYHCX
FSPHX vs RYHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. RYHCX (22.2M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHCX: FSPHX (0.39) vs RYHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RYHCX (25 years). RYHCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). RYHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 244.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHCX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHCX (2500). RYHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.94 vs. FSPHX (6.37). RYHCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.58 vs. FSPHX (-15.45).
| FSPHX | RYHCX | FSPHX / RYHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.40 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.45 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | 9.813 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 22.2M | 30,405% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 15.94 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 25.83 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | 3.58 | -431% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | 35.41 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement