Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHCX
FSPHX vs RYHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs RYHCX
FSPHX vs RYHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. RYHCX (19.4M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHCX: FSPHX (0.41) vs RYHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RYHCX (25 years). RYHCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). RYHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 244.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHCX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHCX (2500). RYHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.73 vs. FSPHX (10.22). RYHCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.00 vs. FSPHX (-14.87).
| FSPHX | RYHCX | FSPHX / RYHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.326 | 6.811 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 19.4M | 32,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 17.73 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.21 | 20.55 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.87 | 6.00 | -248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.70 | 29.93 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement