Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SHSCX
FSPHX vs SHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHSCX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and SHSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSCX has more cash in the bank: 6.35B vs. FSPHX (5.96B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SHSCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs SHSCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHSCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SHSCX (25 years). SHSCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). SHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs SHSCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.38 vs. SHSCX (-12.46). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -11.33 vs. SHSCX (-20.49).
| FSPHX | SHSCX | FSPHX / SHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.312 | -0.460 | -1,372% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 6.35B | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.38 | -12.46 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.03 | -4.27 | -188% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.33 | -20.49 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.27 | 4.81 | 817% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers