Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs SHSCX
FSPHX vs SHSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHSCX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SHSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSCX (6.6B) and FSPHX (6.42B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSPHX pays higher dividends than SHSCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs SHSCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHSCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SHSCX (24 years). SHSCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SHSCX (27.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs SHSCX (1000). SHSCX (-15.67) and FSPHX (-15.88) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -1.68 vs. SHSCX (-8.33).
| FSPHX | SHSCX | FSPHX / SHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.86 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.86 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.743 | -4.501 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 6.6B | 97% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.88 | -15.67 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.14 | -23.51 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.68 | -8.33 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.21 | -5.28 | -99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...