Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SHSCX
FSPHX vs SHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHSCX commentary
Oct 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SHSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSCX (6.04B) and FSPHX (5.88B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSPHX pays higher dividends than SHSCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs SHSCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHSCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SHSCX (25 years). SHSCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). SHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs SHSCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.22 vs. SHSCX (-19.97). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.04 vs. SHSCX (-24.45).
| FSPHX | SHSCX | FSPHX / SHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.982 | -7.241 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 6.04B | 97% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.22 | -19.97 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.79 | -4.76 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.04 | -24.45 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.91 | -1.45 | -1,930% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement