Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SHSCX
FSPHX vs SHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHSCX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SHSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSCX has more cash in the bank: 6.56B vs. FSPHX (6.22B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SHSCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs SHSCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHSCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SHSCX (25 years). SHSCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). SHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs SHSCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.35 vs. SHSCX (-4.22). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -8.45 vs. SHSCX (-16.93).
| FSPHX | SHSCX | FSPHX / SHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.569 | 3.961 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 6.56B | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | -4.22 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.51 | -3.37 | -312% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.45 | -16.93 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.39 | 7.76 | 508% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers