Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SHSCX
FSPHX vs SHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHSCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SHSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSCX has more cash in the bank: 6.31B vs. FSPHX (5.92B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SHSCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs SHSCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHSCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SHSCX (25 years). SHSCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. SHSCX (27.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs SHSCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.29 vs. SHSCX (-19.24). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.91 vs. SHSCX (-23.96).
| FSPHX | SHSCX | FSPHX / SHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.064 | -8.202 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 6.31B | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.29 | -19.24 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.88 | -12.96 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.91 | -23.96 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.24 | -13.86 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers