Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SHSCX
FSPHX vs SHSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs SHSCX
FSPHX vs SHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHSCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SHSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. SHSCX (6.17B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SHSCX: FSPHX (0.39) vs SHSCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHSCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs SHSCX (26 years). SHSCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. SHSCX (43.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs SHSCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. SHSCX (-1.26). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.45 vs. SHSCX (-29.17).
| FSPHX | SHSCX | FSPHX / SHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | -6.255 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 6.17B | 109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | -1.26 | -505% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | -12.27 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | -29.17 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | 10.25 | 450% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement