Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SUHAX
FSPHX vs SUHAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs SUHAX
FSPHX vs SUHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SUHAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SUHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. SUHAX (258M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SUHAX: FSPHX (0.39) vs SUHAX (0.12). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SUHAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs SUHAX (26 years). SUHAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. SUHAX (2.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUHAX: FSPHX (0) vs SUHAX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. SUHAX (5.81). SUHAX return over 5 years is better than : -5.60 vs. FSPHX (-15.45).
| FSPHX | SUHAX | FSPHX / SUHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.35 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | 1.166 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 258M | 2,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.12 | 336% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 5.81 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 8.33 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | -5.60 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.10 | 15.09 | 305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement