Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SUHCX
FSPHX vs SUHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs SUHCX
FSPHX vs SUHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SUHCX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and SUHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. SUHCX (265M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SUHCX: FSPHX (0.42) vs SUHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SUHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs SUHCX (26 years). SUHCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. SUHCX (1.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUHCX: FSPHX (0) vs SUHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. SUHCX (7.96). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -14.09 vs. SUHCX (-17.77).
| FSPHX | SUHCX | FSPHX / SUHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.08 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.574 | 2.822 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 265M | 2,377% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.89 | 7.96 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.79 | -0.85 | -328% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.09 | -17.77 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.32 | -18.55 | -217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers