Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SUHCX
FSPHX vs SUHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs SUHCX
FSPHX vs SUHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SUHCX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SUHCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. SUHCX (259M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SUHCX: FSPHX (0.41) vs SUHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SUHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs SUHCX (26 years). SUHCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. SUHCX (1.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUHCX: FSPHX (0) vs SUHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. SUHCX (2.85). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -17.88 vs. SUHCX (-19.84).
| FSPHX | SUHCX | FSPHX / SUHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.08 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.346 | 0.088 | -2,660% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 259M | 2,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 2.85 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.60 | -3.77 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.88 | -19.84 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.79 | -20.93 | -181% |