Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SUHCX
FSPHX vs SUHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSPHX vs SUHCX
FSPHX vs SUHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SUHCX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and SUHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. SUHCX (264M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SUHCX: FSPHX (0.41) vs SUHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SUHCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs SUHCX (26 years). SUHCX (2.16) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. SUHCX (1.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUHCX: FSPHX (0) vs SUHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. SUHCX (5.48). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -16.32 vs. SUHCX (-17.21).
| FSPHX | SUHCX | FSPHX / SUHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.08 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.16 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.833 | 1.808 | -46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 264M | 2,412% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.60 | 5.48 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.42 | 0.17 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.32 | -17.21 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.96 | -16.31 | -288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement