Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPTX vs RCGTX
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts FSPTX vs RCGTX
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$41.49
Change-$0.16 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.18B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$16.50
Change-$0.07 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPTX is a Buy and RCGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 18.2B vs. RCGTX (1.66B). FSPTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: FSPTX (44 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RCGTX (23.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: FSPTX (0) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.39 vs. FSPTX (21.39). FSPTX return over 5 years is better than : 61.33 vs. RCGTX (-64.74).
| FSPTX | RCGTX | FSPTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.934 | 20.949 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | 1.66B | 1,094% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.39 | 34.39 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.40 | 4.48 | 2,690% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.33 | -64.74 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 271.15 | -64.78 | -419% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement