Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRAX vs HBLAX
FSRAX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRAX vs HBLAX
FSRAX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRAX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jul 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRAX is a StrongBuy and HBLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSRAX (517M). FSRAX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: FSRAX (4.02) vs HBLAX (3.18). FSRAX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FSRAX (21 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). FSRAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRAX (29.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FSRAX (4%) vs FSRAX (4%). FSRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FSRAX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRAX: HBLAX (2000) vs FSRAX (500). FSRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.14 vs. HBLAX (4.94). FSRAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.55 vs. HBLAX (6.11).
| FSRAX | HBLAX | FSRAX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.89 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.884 | 4.286 | 161% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 73% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 517M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 3.18 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.14 | 4.94 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.09 | 18.62 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.55 | 6.11 | 500% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.28 | 37.99 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement