Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRAX vs HBLAX
FSRAX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRAX vs HBLAX
FSRAX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRAX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRAX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FSRAX (542M). FSRAX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: FSRAX (4.25) vs HBLAX (3.13). FSRAX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FSRAX (21 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). FSRAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRAX (29.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FSRAX (4%) vs FSRAX (4%). FSRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FSRAX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRAX: HBLAX (2000) vs FSRAX (500). FSRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.75 vs. HBLAX (1.22). FSRAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| FSRAX | HBLAX | FSRAX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.89 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.808 | 4.076 | 265% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 73% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 542M | 10.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.25 | 3.13 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.75 | 1.22 | 1,128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.98 | 19.75 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.77 | 4.63 | 730% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.26 | 39.00 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement