Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRAX vs HBLAX
FSRAX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRAX vs HBLAX
FSRAX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRAX vs. HBLAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRAX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSRAX (529M). FSRAX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: FSRAX (4.35) vs HBLAX (3.15). FSRAX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FSRAX (21 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). FSRAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRAX (29.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FSRAX (4%) vs FSRAX (4%). FSRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FSRAX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRAX: HBLAX (2000) vs FSRAX (500). FSRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. HBLAX (4.92). FSRAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.95 vs. HBLAX (6.14).
| FSRAX | HBLAX | FSRAX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.89 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.462 | 5.964 | 175% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 73% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.35 | 3.15 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 4.92 | 320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.77 | 23.09 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.95 | 6.14 | 585% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.33 | 39.11 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement