Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRAX vs HBLIX
FSRAX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FSRAX vs HBLIX
FSRAX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRAX vs. HBLIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRAX is a Hold and HBLIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSRAX (592M). FSRAX pays higher dividends than HBLIX: FSRAX (3.93) vs HBLIX (3.40). FSRAX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FSRAX (21 years) vs HBLIX (16 years). FSRAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLIX (0.66). HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRAX (29.00). FSRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FSRAX (0) vs HBLIX (2000). FSRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.24 vs. HBLIX (6.17). FSRAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.79 vs. HBLIX (7.95).
| FSRAX | HBLIX | FSRAX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.66 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.66 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.506 | 3.798 | 171% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 592M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.93 | 3.40 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.24 | 6.17 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.56 | 21.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.79 | 7.95 | 400% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.11 | 45.74 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement