Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRAX vs HBLSX
FSRAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FSRAX vs HBLSX
FSRAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRAX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRAX is a Hold and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSRAX (592M). FSRAX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: FSRAX (3.93) vs HBLSX (3.08). FSRAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FSRAX (21 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). FSRAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRAX (29.00). FSRAX (0) and HBLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.24 vs. HBLSX (5.86). FSRAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.79 vs. HBLSX (6.36).
| FSRAX | HBLSX | FSRAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.96 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.96 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.506 | 3.608 | 180% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 592M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.93 | 3.08 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.24 | 5.86 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.56 | 20.07 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.79 | 6.36 | 500% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.11 | 41.96 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement