Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRAX vs HBLSX
FSRAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FSRAX vs HBLSX
FSRAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRAX vs. HBLSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRAX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSRAX (529M). FSRAX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: FSRAX (4.35) vs HBLSX (3.04). FSRAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FSRAX (21 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). FSRAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRAX (29.00). FSRAX (0) and HBLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. HBLSX (4.85). FSRAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.95 vs. HBLSX (5.83).
| FSRAX | HBLSX | FSRAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.96 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.96 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.462 | 5.860 | 179% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.35 | 3.04 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 4.85 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.77 | 22.86 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.95 | 5.83 | 617% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.33 | 38.43 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement