Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRBX vs RPFGX
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FSRBX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$29.54
Change+$0.43 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets409.71M
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRBX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRBX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. FSRBX (410M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FSRBX (2.30) vs RPFGX (1.43). FSRBX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FSRBX (39 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). RPFGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.71). FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FSRBX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.37 vs. FSRBX (15.93). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 102.96 vs. FSRBX (87.42).
| FSRBX | RPFGX | FSRBX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.268 | 8.724 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 410M | 1.06B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 1.43 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.93 | 24.37 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.01 | 62.39 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.42 | 102.96 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.54 | 84.45 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement