Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRBX vs RPFGX
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FSRBX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$31.30
Change-$0.75 (-2.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.73M
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRBX vs. RPFGX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRBX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. FSRBX (431M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FSRBX (2.12) vs RPFGX (1.35). FSRBX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FSRBX (39 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). RPFGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.71). FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FSRBX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.25 vs. FSRBX (14.05). FSRBX return over 5 years is better than : 118.67 vs. RPFGX (110.13).
| FSRBX | RPFGX | FSRBX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.199 | 12.232 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 431M | 1.12B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 1.35 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.05 | 23.25 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.87 | 60.19 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.67 | 110.13 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.90 | 87.74 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement