Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRBX vs RPFGX
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FSRBX vs RPFGX
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRBX vs. RPFGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRBX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. FSRBX (515M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FSRBX (1.95) vs RPFGX (1.24). FSRBX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FSRBX (40 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). RPFGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.69). FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RPFGX (10.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FSRBX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.79 vs. RPFGX (14.03). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 60.53 vs. FSRBX (56.94).
| FSRBX | RPFGX | FSRBX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.94 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.94 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.600 | 3.414 | 398% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 515M | 1.19B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 1.24 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.79 | 14.03 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.57 | 66.86 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.94 | 60.53 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.47 | 132.79 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement