Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 260.8M. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 10.07M to 511.53M. FSRFX holds the highest valuation in this group at 511.53M. The lowest valued company is RYCNX at 10.07M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -3%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -5%, and the average quarterly price growth was 3%. RYCNX experienced the highest price growth at -2%, while FSRFX experienced the biggest fall at -3%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
FSRFX vs. RYCNX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Hold and RYCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 512M vs. RYCNX (10.1M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than RYCNX: FSRFX (0.82) vs RYCNX (0.06). FSRFX was incepted earlier than RYCNX: FSRFX (40 years) vs RYCNX (25 years). RYCNX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.68). RYCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. FSRFX (40.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCNX: FSRFX (0) vs RYCNX (2500). FSRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.04 vs. RYCNX (7.78). FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.97 vs. RYCNX (-24.57).
| FSRFX | RYCNX | FSRFX / RYCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.425 | 2.813 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 512M | 10.1M | 5,069% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.06 | 1,311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.04 | 7.78 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | 10.38 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.97 | -24.57 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.00 | 21.80 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers