Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRFX vs. RYCNX commentary
Jul 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Buy and RYCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 531M vs. RYCNX (6.04M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than RYCNX: FSRFX (0.79) vs RYCNX (0.06). FSRFX was incepted earlier than RYCNX: FSRFX (40 years) vs RYCNX (25 years). RYCNX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.68). RYCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. FSRFX (40.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCNX: FSRFX (0) vs RYCNX (2500). FSRFX (17.58) and RYCNX (16.85) have marching annual gain over last year. FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.15 vs. RYCNX (-20.22).
| FSRFX | RYCNX | FSRFX / RYCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.268 | 9.391 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 6.04M | 8,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.06 | 1,331% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.58 | 16.85 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.43 | 11.64 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.15 | -20.22 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.78 | 32.24 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers