Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRFX vs. RYCNX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Buy and RYCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 516M vs. RYCNX (6.56M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than RYCNX: FSRFX (0.82) vs RYCNX (0.06). FSRFX was incepted earlier than RYCNX: FSRFX (40 years) vs RYCNX (25 years). RYCNX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.68). RYCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSRFX (40.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCNX: FSRFX (0) vs RYCNX (2500). RYCNX (21.93) and FSRFX (21.85) have marching annual gain over last year. FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.83 vs. RYCNX (-24.41).
| FSRFX | RYCNX | FSRFX / RYCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.975 | 8.037 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 516M | 6.56M | 7,869% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.06 | 1,386% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.85 | 21.93 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.59 | 21.06 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.83 | -24.41 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.40 | 41.97 | 189% |