Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRFX vs RYPAX
FSRFX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs RYPAX
FSRFX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRFX vs. RYPAX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Hold and RYPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 512M vs. RYPAX (5.57M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than RYPAX: FSRFX (0.82) vs RYPAX (0.05). FSRFX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FSRFX (40 years) vs RYPAX (28 years). RYPAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.68). RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. FSRFX (40.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FSRFX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). FSRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. RYPAX (1.76). FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.15 vs. RYPAX (-19.23).
| FSRFX | RYPAX | FSRFX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.63 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.68 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.974 | 1.188 | 334% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 512M | 5.57M | 9,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.05 | 1,538% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 1.76 | 545% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.29 | 14.53 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.15 | -19.23 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.32 | 37.04 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement