Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRFX vs RYPAX
FSRFX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs RYPAX
FSRFX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRFX vs. RYPAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Buy and RYPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 516M vs. RYPAX (6.74M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than RYPAX: FSRFX (0.82) vs RYPAX (0.05). FSRFX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FSRFX (40 years) vs RYPAX (28 years). RYPAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.68). RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSRFX (40.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FSRFX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). RYPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.64 vs. FSRFX (24.22). FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.92 vs. RYPAX (-17.68).
| FSRFX | RYPAX | FSRFX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.69 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.235 | 10.891 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 516M | 6.74M | 7,651% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.05 | 1,624% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.22 | 26.64 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.98 | 25.89 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.92 | -17.68 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.69 | 58.52 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement