Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRFX vs TRGAX
FSRFX vs TRGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs TRGAX
FSRFX vs TRGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRFX vs. TRGAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Buy and TRGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 516M vs. TRGAX (177M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than TRGAX: FSRFX (0.82) vs TRGAX (0.45). FSRFX was incepted earlier than TRGAX: FSRFX (40 years) vs TRGAX (9 years). TRGAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.68). TRGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.50 vs. FSRFX (40.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGAX: FSRFX (0) vs TRGAX (500000). FSRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.22 vs. TRGAX (21.11). TRGAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.13 vs. FSRFX (17.92).
| FSRFX | TRGAX | FSRFX / TRGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.73 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.94 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.235 | 13.400 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 516M | 177M | 292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.45 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.22 | 21.11 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.98 | 48.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.92 | 37.13 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement