Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRKX vs HBLAX
FSRKX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRKX vs HBLAX
FSRKX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRKX vs. HBLAX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRKX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FSRKX (529M). FSRKX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: FSRKX (4.68) vs HBLAX (3.15). FSRKX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FSRKX (7 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSRKX (0.64). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRKX (29.00). FSRKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FSRKX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). FSRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.12 vs. HBLAX (5.54). FSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 35.22 vs. HBLAX (6.51).
| FSRKX | HBLAX | FSRKX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.89 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.89 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.293 | 6.523 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.68 | 3.15 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.12 | 5.54 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.55 | 22.84 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.22 | 6.51 | 541% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement