Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRKX vs HBLIX
FSRKX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FSRKX vs HBLIX
FSRKX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRKX vs. HBLIX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRKX is a Hold and HBLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. FSRKX (517M). FSRKX pays higher dividends than HBLIX: FSRKX (4.36) vs HBLIX (3.39). FSRKX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FSRKX (7 years) vs HBLIX (16 years). HBLIX (0.66) and FSRKX (0.64) have similar cost to investors . HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRKX (29.00). FSRKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FSRKX (0) vs HBLIX (2000). FSRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.10 vs. HBLIX (3.91). FSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 35.22 vs. HBLIX (6.61).
| FSRKX | HBLIX | FSRKX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.66 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.66 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.950 | 3.912 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 11B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.36 | 3.39 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 3.91 | 361% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.35 | 17.63 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.22 | 6.61 | 532% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement