Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRNX vs VRTPX
FSRNX vs VRTPX Comparison
Open Charts FSRNX vs VRTPX
FSRNX vs VRTPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRNX vs. VRTPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRNX is a Buy and VRTPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTPX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FSRNX (3.14B). VRTPX pays higher dividends than FSRNX: VRTPX (3.57) vs FSRNX (2.55). FSRNX was incepted earlier than VRTPX: FSRNX (15 years) vs VRTPX (9 years). VRTPX (0.08) is less costly to investors than FSRNX (0.07). FSRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. VRTPX (3.00). FSRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRTPX: FSRNX (0) vs VRTPX (100000000). FSRNX (10.34) and VRTPX (10.22) have marching annual gain over last year. VRTPX return over 5 years is better than : 13.15 vs. FSRNX (11.88).
| FSRNX | VRTPX | FSRNX / VRTPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.08 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.08 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.919 | 10.343 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.14B | 10.5B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 3.57 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.34 | 10.22 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.22 | 36.21 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.88 | 13.15 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement