Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRNX vs VRTPX
FSRNX vs VRTPX Comparison
Open Charts FSRNX vs VRTPX
FSRNX vs VRTPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRNX vs. VRTPX commentary
Aug 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRNX is a Hold and VRTPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTPX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. FSRNX (3.25B). VRTPX pays higher dividends than FSRNX: VRTPX (3.52) vs FSRNX (2.60). FSRNX was incepted earlier than VRTPX: FSRNX (15 years) vs VRTPX (9 years). VRTPX (0.08) is less costly to investors than FSRNX (0.07). FSRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. VRTPX (3.00). FSRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRTPX: FSRNX (0) vs VRTPX (100000000). VRTPX (13.92) and FSRNX (13.52) have marching annual gain over last year. FSRNX (11.46) and VRTPX (11.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSRNX | VRTPX | FSRNX / VRTPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.08 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.08 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.156 | 13.421 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.25B | 11B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 3.52 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.52 | 13.92 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.27 | 32.81 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.46 | 11.12 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement