Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYLAX
FSRPX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYLAX
FSRPX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.35B vs. RYLAX (6.1M). FSRPX pays higher dividends than RYLAX: FSRPX (0.16) vs RYLAX (0.07). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSRPX (41 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.63). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FSRPX (46.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSRPX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYLAX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.13 vs. FSRPX (-8.05). RYLAX return over 5 years is better than : -9.76 vs. FSRPX (-30.62).
| FSRPX | RYLAX | FSRPX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.63 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.464 | -5.073 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.35B | 6.1M | 38,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.07 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.05 | -4.13 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.85 | 30.08 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.62 | -9.76 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.96 | 59.07 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement