Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYLAX
FSRPX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYLAX
FSRPX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYLAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Hold and RYLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.35B vs. RYLAX (6.23M). FSRPX pays higher dividends than RYLAX: FSRPX (0.16) vs RYLAX (0.07). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSRPX (40 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.63). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FSRPX (46.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSRPX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYLAX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. FSRPX (-8.11). RYLAX return over 5 years is better than : -7.65 vs. FSRPX (-26.18).
| FSRPX | RYLAX | FSRPX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.63 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.292 | -4.109 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.35B | 6.23M | 37,669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.07 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.11 | -0.90 | 905% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.01 | 32.56 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.18 | -7.65 | 342% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.96 | 54.89 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers