Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYLCX
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYLCX
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Buy and RYLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. RYLCX (6.17M). FSRPX pays higher dividends than RYLCX: FSRPX (0.16) vs RYLCX (0.08). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSRPX (41 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.63). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSRPX (46.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSRPX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYLCX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.42 vs. FSRPX (-10.49). RYLCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.06 vs. FSRPX (-29.92).
| FSRPX | RYLCX | FSRPX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.39 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.44 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.958 | -3.231 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 6.17M | 36,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.08 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.49 | -6.42 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.45 | 21.83 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.92 | -9.06 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.94 | 40.74 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement