Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYLCX
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYLCX
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYLCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Hold and RYLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. RYLCX (4.82M). FSRPX pays higher dividends than RYLCX: FSRPX (0.16) vs RYLCX (0.08). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSRPX (41 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.63). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSRPX (46.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSRPX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYLCX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.80 vs. FSRPX (-18.39). RYLCX return over 5 years is better than : -10.82 vs. FSRPX (-31.89).
| FSRPX | RYLCX | FSRPX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.473 | -6.166 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 4.82M | 45,341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.08 | 207% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.39 | -10.80 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.20 | 23.67 | -39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.89 | -10.82 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.39 | 39.83 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement