Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYRCX
FSRPX vs RYRCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYRCX
FSRPX vs RYRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYRCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Buy and RYRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.35B vs. RYRCX (4.57M). RYRCX pays higher dividends than FSRPX: RYRCX (2.29) vs FSRPX (0.16). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYRCX: FSRPX (41 years) vs RYRCX (25 years). RYRCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.63). RYRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 296.00 vs. FSRPX (46.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYRCX: FSRPX (0) vs RYRCX (2500). RYRCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYRCX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.58 vs. FSRPX (-5.58). RYRCX return over 5 years is better than : -7.76 vs. FSRPX (-28.99).
| FSRPX | RYRCX | FSRPX / RYRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.39 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.44 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.734 | -2.500 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.35B | 4.57M | 51,335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 2.29 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.58 | 5.58 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.10 | 33.09 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.99 | -7.76 | 374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.00 | 106.03 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers