Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRRX vs HBLAX
FSRRX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRRX vs HBLAX
FSRRX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRRX vs. HBLAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRRX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSRRX (529M). FSRRX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: FSRRX (4.59) vs HBLAX (3.15). FSRRX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FSRRX (21 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSRRX (0.77). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRRX (29.00). FSRRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FSRRX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRRX: HBLAX (2000) vs FSRRX (500). FSRRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.10 vs. HBLAX (4.92). FSRRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.81 vs. HBLAX (6.14).
| FSRRX | HBLAX | FSRRX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.89 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.671 | 5.964 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.59 | 3.15 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.10 | 4.92 | 328% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.94 | 23.09 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.81 | 6.14 | 616% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.56 | 39.11 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement