Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRRX vs HBLCX
FSRRX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRRX vs HBLCX
FSRRX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRRX vs. HBLCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRRX is a Buy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSRRX (529M). FSRRX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FSRRX (4.59) vs HBLCX (2.45). FSRRX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FSRRX (21 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FSRRX (0.77). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRRX (29.00). FSRRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FSRRX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRRX: HBLCX (2000) vs FSRRX (500). FSRRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.10 vs. HBLCX (3.96). FSRRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.81 vs. HBLCX (1.89).
| FSRRX | HBLCX | FSRRX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.65 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.671 | 5.443 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.59 | 2.45 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.10 | 3.96 | 406% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.94 | 20.05 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.81 | 1.89 | 2,006% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.56 | 29.35 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement