Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRRX vs HBLRX
FSRRX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FSRRX vs HBLRX
FSRRX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRRX vs. HBLRX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRRX is a StrongBuy and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FSRRX (592M). FSRRX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FSRRX (4.15) vs HBLRX (2.80). FSRRX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FSRRX (21 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSRRX (0.77). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRRX (29.00). FSRRX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.56 vs. HBLRX (5.53). FSRRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.28 vs. HBLRX (4.08).
| FSRRX | HBLRX | FSRRX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.27 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.27 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.784 | 4.094 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 592M | 11.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.15 | 2.80 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.56 | 5.53 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.79 | 19.29 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.28 | 4.08 | 815% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.42 | 38.50 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement