Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRRX vs HBLRX
FSRRX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FSRRX vs HBLRX
FSRRX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRRX vs. HBLRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRRX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSRRX (529M). FSRRX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FSRRX (4.59) vs HBLRX (2.76). FSRRX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FSRRX (21 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSRRX (0.77). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRRX (29.00). FSRRX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.10 vs. HBLRX (4.55). FSRRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.81 vs. HBLRX (4.28).
| FSRRX | HBLRX | FSRRX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.27 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.27 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.671 | 5.721 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.59 | 2.76 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.10 | 4.55 | 354% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.94 | 21.77 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.81 | 4.28 | 883% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.56 | 34.84 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement