Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRTX vs HBLIX
FSRTX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FSRTX vs HBLIX
FSRTX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRTX vs. HBLIX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRTX is a Buy and HBLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FSRTX (529M). FSRTX pays higher dividends than HBLIX: FSRTX (4.32) vs HBLIX (3.37). FSRTX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FSRTX (21 years) vs HBLIX (16 years). FSRTX (1.05) is less costly to investors than HBLIX (0.66). HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRTX (29.00). FSRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FSRTX (0) vs HBLIX (2000). FSRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.54 vs. HBLIX (5.71). FSRTX return over 5 years is better than : 32.06 vs. HBLIX (7.72).
| FSRTX | HBLIX | FSRTX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.66 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.66 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.939 | 6.641 | 135% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.32 | 3.37 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.54 | 5.71 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.76 | 23.70 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.06 | 7.72 | 415% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.37 | 43.41 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement