Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRTX vs HBLRX
FSRTX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FSRTX vs HBLRX
FSRTX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRTX vs. HBLRX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRTX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FSRTX (529M). FSRTX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FSRTX (4.32) vs HBLRX (2.76). FSRTX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FSRTX (21 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSRTX (1.05). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRTX (29.00). FSRTX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.54 vs. HBLRX (5.16). FSRTX return over 5 years is better than : 32.06 vs. HBLRX (4.58).
| FSRTX | HBLRX | FSRTX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.27 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.27 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.939 | 6.276 | 142% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.32 | 2.76 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.54 | 5.16 | 282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.76 | 21.52 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.06 | 4.58 | 700% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.37 | 36.03 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement