Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRTX vs HBLSX
FSRTX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FSRTX vs HBLSX
FSRTX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRTX vs. HBLSX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRTX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FSRTX (529M). FSRTX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: FSRTX (4.32) vs HBLSX (3.04). FSRTX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FSRTX (21 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). FSRTX (1.05) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSRTX (29.00). FSRTX (0) and HBLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.54 vs. HBLSX (5.47). FSRTX return over 5 years is better than : 32.06 vs. HBLSX (6.13).
| FSRTX | HBLSX | FSRTX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.96 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.96 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.939 | 6.415 | 139% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.32 | 3.04 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.54 | 5.47 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.76 | 22.61 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.06 | 6.13 | 523% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.37 | 39.75 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement