Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSAX vs WCMLX
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSAX vs WCMLX
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.57B vs. WCMLX (51.9M). FSSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSAX (26 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSAX (0.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSSAX (48.01). FSSAX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.65 vs. WCMLX (17.02). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. FSSAX (-1.73).
| FSSAX | WCMLX | FSSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.036 | 11.410 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 51.9M | 4,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.65 | 17.02 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.02 | 32.50 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.73 | 3.16 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers