Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSAX vs WCMNX
FSSAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSSAX vs WCMNX
FSSAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSAX is a StrongBuy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. WCMNX (52.2M). FSSAX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSSAX (26 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSSAX (0.79). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSSAX (16.31). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSSAX: WCMNX (1000) vs FSSAX (100000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.84 vs. FSSAX (14.80). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. FSSAX (-9.11).
| FSSAX | WCMNX | FSSAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.04 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.182 | 10.111 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 52.2M | 4,726% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.80 | 16.84 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.43 | 21.90 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.11 | -2.29 | 397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers