Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSAX vs WCMNX
FSSAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSSAX vs WCMNX
FSSAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSAX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. WCMNX (46.1M). FSSAX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSSAX (26 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSSAX (0.82). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSSAX (48.01). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSSAX: WCMNX (1000) vs FSSAX (100000). FSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. WCMNX (0.00). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -10.10 vs. FSSAX (-11.61).
| FSSAX | WCMNX | FSSAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.24 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.04 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.893 | 3.100 | 287% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 46.1M | 5,067% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.60 | 23.52 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.61 | -10.10 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers