Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSGX vs RNWBX
FSSGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FSSGX vs RNWBX
FSSGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FSSGX (132M). FSSGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FSSGX (1.26) vs RNWBX (0.41). FSSGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FSSGX (4 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FSSGX (1.05). FSSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). FSSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FSSGX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FSSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.25 vs. RNWBX (18.14).
| FSSGX | RNWBX | FSSGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.66 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.182 | 12.082 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.41 | 306% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.25 | 18.14 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.15 | 39.22 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 9.30 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement